[UPDATE 4] 2:30 PM 30 August: Fairpoint DNS servers are now updated. I’m glad to be able to put this migration behind me. We’re on a new “virtual machine” server with half a dozen other relatively low-volume sites with plenty of server resources to go around including gobs of disk space. Moving on…
[UPDATE 3] 7:10 AM 30 August: The Fairpoint DNS issue continues. There were some other sites involved in last night’s move and none of them are accessible to people using Fairpoint DNS servers. In other words, Fairpoint customers more than likely can’t get to this site yet. That is outrageous. I’ll be filing a ticket with Fairpoint later. At first it looked like one Fairpoint server was working- NS2. However it has not fully updated either so I’ve set my own servers to Google’s public DNS servers 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4.
[UPDATE 2] 9:55 pm 29 August: It appears the DNS problem was/is limited to Fairpoint customers as a result of two misconfigured name servers NS1.MYFAIRPOINT.NET and NS3.MYFAIRPOINT.NET which are failing to respond properly. I solved the problem on my network by manually setting the primary DNS server to NS2.MYFAIRPOINT.NET which is responding properly. The TTL (time to live) on Fairpoint DSL name servers is set to 19 hours which is a bit outrageous. I’ll be speaking to them. If this sounds like so much gibberish and you’re reading it, don’t worry about it. If you found Clarylake.org was unavailable for a day and then suddenly started working, that’s why. Sorry for any inconvenience.
[UPDATE 1] 9:03 PM 30 August: The migration has taken place but there are some residual DNS problems resulting from poorly configured servers most notably with Fairpoint. This is making the site unavailable to some users. Most notably, this is affecting ME so I’m on a proxy now. Patience folks.
Back on the 18th of August I posted about a plan to migrate this website to a new server. I thought this would have taken place by now but it turned out to be a little more involved as there are a number of other sites that share the same virtual machine and they all needed special attention. Anyways, the transition plan has been refined and tested and we’re ready to implement it. Theoretically nobody should notice a thing as the cut-over will take place late tonight when traffic is particularly slow, and it should only involve a few minutes of downtime. There may be a short period when the domain name clarylake.org doesn’t resolve properly. If you get a “Non-existent domain” or “page not found” error you may need to clear your browser cache, close and reopen your browser, or just try again later. Long before tomorrow morning arrives we’ll be back fully operational.

David Hodsdon sent me an article from last week’s Lincoln County News about a recent inspection of the Montsweag dam in Wiscasset. The inspection was conducted by Wright and Pierce Engineering Company. Of particular interest is the last paragraph which describes the permitting requirements for the making the repairs:
Branch Pond Water Level Petition goes to Public Hearing today, the hearing is at the China Elementary School in China on Route 9. The hearing starts at 9 AM and runs ALL DAY and into the night with the public-comments section starting at 6 PM. I’m going to attend it for a while this morning but I have some other responsibilities to attend to later in the day.
Paul Koenig has written an article that appears in today’s Kennebec Journal. I was interviewed for the article late last week.
Yesterday was the one year anniversary of the Public Hearing for the water level petition, held on August 17, 2012 at the firehouse in Jefferson. So much has transpired since then, it really seems a lot longer but it has been just a year. This seems like a good time to take a step back and consider where we are and what has transpired. Clearly we are a lot closer to a getting water level order on the Clary Lake dam but I can’t say as I’m particularly happy with how it’s gone. Sadly, the rhetoric around this issue has been ratcheted up by both sides and that has not been particularly helpful either. Going forward I’m going to do what I can to keep things more civil.
I’ve had a chance to reread and ponder (like the chump at left) the comments posted by Tony Buxton today and I have a few observations to make before I move on. First, very little of the document has anything to do with the actual restrictive covenants themselves, which is what this exercise was all about I think. In fact, only one paragraph on the first page addresses them at all. I particularly like this part:
This just in to the Service List: Tony Buxton himself has responded to the request for comments in Procedural Order #8 and I’m posting it only having skimmed it. So far, I like mine better.
Moments ago I posted the Petitioner’s Comments on the Restrictive Covenants that Paul Kelley recently placed on the Clary Lake dam to the
David Hodsdon reports that the lake water quality has improved from 2 weeks ago when an algae bloom was rapidly developing. The secchi disk reading at 9.84′ was almost double the last reading and they observed “particulate matter” on and just under the surface which undoubtedly the decaying carcasses of the blue-green algae that were causing the bloom. I’ve updated the
The Department wasted no time in addressing my submission last Friday of Kelley’s Covenants, issuing this afternoon Department Procedural Order #8. The Order is short and sweet as is the time given for comments: 3 days. The Order included an updated
Our treasurer Linda Gallion tells me that she’s received only 44 membership renewals so far this year. The majority of our members pay up at the Annual meeting but this year a number of people showed up for the meeting but must have forgotten their checkbooks. It is not unusual for membership renewals to trickle in for a while after the annual meeting. It’s not too late! Dues are $25 and you can sign up online if you want.
For the second time I have written a (lengthy) letter to Kathy Howatt, the DEP staff person in charge of Kelley’s petition for release from dam ownership or water level maintenance, requesting the Department dismiss Kelley’s petition
I just sent the following email to the Clary Lake water level petition