I went to the Branch Pond water level petition public hearing today and ended up spending most of the day there, and took a few pictures which I’ve uploaded to the Summer 2013 Album. I had not initially planned on staying too long but I had particularly wanted to hear Peter Newkirk of the Division of Environmental Assessment give his presentation and that turned out to be after lunch. He was there primarily to explain how he came up with the 1.7′ maximum annual fluctuation figure, and to defend it if necessary. No defense was necessary as nobody really questioned it. I was actually surprised there wasn’t more discussion about it. I finally left around 3 PM at which time the hearing was beginning to wind down.
I found the whole hearing interesting and I’m glad I went. It was particularly interesting to compare it with our own public hearing: this one started at 9 AM and was scheduled to run until 5 PM and be followed by a public comment period starting at 6 PM. Furthermore, all the testimony had been pre-filed, commented on, objected to, and ruled on DAYS BEFORE today’s hearing. Today was to allow the presentation of the testimony and evidence with opportunity for review and cross examination in real time. For comparison, our hearing started at 5 PM and ran for 5 1/2 hours and was over, and there were a number of people who didn’t get a chance to speak at all. I was even cut short in my testimony. Clearly, DEP learned a lot from the Clary Lake hearing process and have implemented improved procedures. Someone had to go first and I guess it might as well have been us paving the way.
Surprisingly, there were no representatives of the press there.
[UPDATE] OK, so there were representatives of the press there, Channel 13 News apparently sent a crew over likely late afternoon after I had left:
http://www.wgme.com/news/top-stories/stories/wgme_vid_18429.shtml

Branch Pond Water Level Petition goes to Public Hearing today, the hearing is at the China Elementary School in China on Route 9. The hearing starts at 9 AM and runs ALL DAY and into the night with the public-comments section starting at 6 PM. I’m going to attend it for a while this morning but I have some other responsibilities to attend to later in the day.
Paul Koenig has written an article that appears in today’s Kennebec Journal. I was interviewed for the article late last week.
Yesterday was the one year anniversary of the Public Hearing for the water level petition, held on August 17, 2012 at the firehouse in Jefferson. So much has transpired since then, it really seems a lot longer but it has been just a year. This seems like a good time to take a step back and consider where we are and what has transpired. Clearly we are a lot closer to a getting water level order on the Clary Lake dam but I can’t say as I’m particularly happy with how it’s gone. Sadly, the rhetoric around this issue has been ratcheted up by both sides and that has not been particularly helpful either. Going forward I’m going to do what I can to keep things more civil.
I’m going to be moving the site to a new server in a few days. The picture at left is misleading, the site actually runs on a VM (virtual machine) in an IT operations center someplace on the East coast and we’ll just be moving to another VM in the same operations center. There shouldn’t be any down time to speak of but there may be 10 or 15 minutes that the site is unavailable while the DNS updates. I’ll post an update ahead of time.
I’ve had a chance to reread and ponder (like the chump at left) the comments posted by Tony Buxton today and I have a few observations to make before I move on. First, very little of the document has anything to do with the actual restrictive covenants themselves, which is what this exercise was all about I think. In fact, only one paragraph on the first page addresses them at all. I particularly like this part:
This just in to the Service List: Tony Buxton himself has responded to the request for comments in Procedural Order #8 and I’m posting it only having skimmed it. So far, I like mine better.
Moments ago I posted the Petitioner’s Comments on the Restrictive Covenants that Paul Kelley recently placed on the Clary Lake dam to the
David Hodsdon reports that the lake water quality has improved from 2 weeks ago when an algae bloom was rapidly developing. The secchi disk reading at 9.84′ was almost double the last reading and they observed “particulate matter” on and just under the surface which undoubtedly the decaying carcasses of the blue-green algae that were causing the bloom. I’ve updated the
The Department wasted no time in addressing my submission last Friday of Kelley’s Covenants, issuing this afternoon Department Procedural Order #8. The Order is short and sweet as is the time given for comments: 3 days. The Order included an updated
Our treasurer Linda Gallion tells me that she’s received only 44 membership renewals so far this year. The majority of our members pay up at the Annual meeting but this year a number of people showed up for the meeting but must have forgotten their checkbooks. It is not unusual for membership renewals to trickle in for a while after the annual meeting. It’s not too late! Dues are $25 and you can sign up online if you want.
For the second time I have written a (lengthy) letter to Kathy Howatt, the DEP staff person in charge of Kelley’s petition for release from dam ownership or water level maintenance, requesting the Department dismiss Kelley’s petition
I just sent the following email to the Clary Lake water level petition