29 January 2014: Announcing the Clary Dam Project, a computer mediated discussion group

Now that the State’s Water Level Order has been issued, the dam owner faces a number of daunting tasks and a challenging time line to complete the work of bringing the dam property into compliance with the Order. The Clary Lake Association has made it publicly known that we are ready and willing to assist the dam owner in completing this work but to date they have not expressed any interest in having us help them. It also remains to be seen just how willing the Membership really is to help Mr. Kelley with his problem. Nonetheless the Clary Lake Association is confident that sooner or later we will be asked for help or even asked to take over ownership of the dam completely and feel therefore that it is in our current best interests and long term goals to start acting like the stewards of Clary Lake that we claim to be.

Complying with the Water Level Order will involve a lot of money and a daunting amount of work on the part of many people and while we may all personally relish the prospect of this work, it is daunting nonetheless. Success depends on a committed and coordinated group effort which in turn requires organization and planning. Failure is not an option. It is our belief that full adherence to the conditions specified in the Water Level Order and implementing the water level regime contained therein are crucial steps to meeting the goals of the Clary Lake Association of protecting and preserving Clary Lake, now, and into the future. To this end I have setup the Clary Dam Project. This is a collaborative, interactive, computer-mediated discussion group for the express purpose of facilitating the exchange of information and ideas between like-minded people with a common goal. Continue reading

28 January 2014 Kennebec Journal: State issues final plan for Clary Lake in Whitefield

There is an article in today’s Kennebec Journal about the issuance of the Final Clary Lake Water Level Order. While it contains a few mistakes, it’s pretty much factually accurate and contains a link to the actual ORDER document. I did speak briefly with KJ correspondent Paul Koenig about the order, shortly after it was issued. I gave him a few choice quotes which apparently he found not to be particularly quotable…

[2:40 PM] Sorry I just realized I used a broken link for the online newspaper article. It’s fixed now. Also would like to remind everyone that the KJ supports reader comments 🙂

State issues final plan for Clary Lake in Whitefield

[archived copy] State issues final plan for Clary Lake in Whitefield

I would like to make one observation. Apparently Mr. Koenig also spoke to Paul Kelley before writing the article:

“Kelley pointed out that although the department originally requested parties respond to the draft order in less than five full business days, the DEP took three weeks to review comments before issuing essentially the same order.”

So Paul Kelley is accusing the Department of providing him with less than the legally mandated 5 business days to comment on the Order. Really? Let’s see: the DRAFT order was issued on Thursday December 19th and the comment period was to end at the close of business on Monday December 30th. Counting on my fingers that is… Gee: 6 business days, not including Christmas.

27 January 2014: DEP Issues FINAL Clary Lake Water Level Order!

At a little before 2:30 PM this afternoon the Department of Environmental Protection issued the FINAL Clary Lake Water Level Order. I have scanned it quickly as have a couple of other people and we can’t see any changes between today’s final order and the Draft order issued back on December 19th. I will be reading it over carefully again shortly.

Here is a link to the FINAL order; it’s over 6 megabytes in size. As soon as I get a chance I will print out the relevant sections of the order into separate PDF files for easier consumption.

Final Clary Lake Water Level Order

Final Order Only (just under 3 megabytes)

I’ve gone through the order pretty carefully and I’ve only found a few minor changes:

1) The Final order includes Standard Conditions for Water Level Orders.

2) Per Senator Chris Johnson’s suggestion, the word “Insure” has been changed to “Ensure” 🙂

3) They refined the requirements for water level measurements. In the draft order this was daily “during times of rapid water level rise and on a monthly basis at all other times.” This changed to “Beginning June 1 through September 30 of any given calendar year, the level of the lake and the gate opening status shall be logged every other week and on a daily basis during times of rapid water level rise. At all other times, the level of the lake and the gate opening status shall logged on a monthly basis.”

That’s it as far as I can see.

25 January 2014: Clary Lake Association Community set up on Google+

I have set up a Clary Lake Association Community on Google Plus. Online social networking communities provide means, methods, and opportunities for people to share and exchange information in ways that just aren’t offered by an more traditional information-distribution site such as this one. On this site, I post stuff and people can comment the posts and reply to comments, but it’s not the same thing as being involved in an online community. It has only been in existence for less than an hour and already there are 9 members and a video posted by David Chase. Go figure.

The Clary Lake Association community will also be a source of material for this site. That’s a good thing. If anyone has any questions about all this, email me or comment!

Google+ Embedded Post Example

I am testing embedding Google+ posts on the web site. This may or may not work on your computer/browser combination. In particular it seems Chrome on Windows XP seems not to work. If anyone has trouble viewing these posts, please email me or leave a comment with your operating system and browser. Thanks.

25 January 2014: Maine Lakefront Property Owners Encouraged to Contact Legislators About Bill to Control Invasive Plant Infestations

Maine lakefront property owners should know that a bill is now before the legislature that would finally provide some significant funding for those working to control invasive aquatic plant infestations. LD 1626 was presented by Representative Mike McClellan of Raymond. It would raise the milfoil sticker fees for in-state boats by $7 and $15 for out-of-state boats. The proceeds would help fund suction harvesting, bottom barrier work and hand-pulling. You can read the whole article at: http://blog.mrlakefront.net

Thanks to Jack Holland for bringing this to my attention.

18 January 2014: Outflows from Clary Lake exceed 50 CFS

With the lake level higher than it’s been in several years, it follows that outflows from the lake should also be at levels not seen for quite some time. Well I had occasion to measure the outflow from Clary Lake this morning, out of curiosity as much as anything and sure enough, based on my calculations the current outflows as of the time of this writing are on the order of 83 cfs (cubic feet per second). The raw figure I arrived at was 98 cfs but it is customary to scale that figure down by as much as 15% to allow for flow losses resulting from friction on the sides and bottom of the stream which inevitably result in uneven water velocity and a lower overall flow value.

I estimate that about 55 cfs of water is flowing out of the dam’s outlet pipe and the rest of the water, about 30 cfs, is the result of water leaking through the hole in the dam and from seams on either side of the outlet. That there is a substantial amount of water leaking through the hole and cracks is apparent just by standing on the side of the road and looking at the downstream face of the dam. Here’s a short video I took this morning. What you can’t see in this video is the water leaking through the dam on the left side. It it essentially leaking across the entire face of the dam: Continue reading

14 January 2014: Lake level continues to rise

dam_14january2014Too bad it’s winter time and not boating time! The 2.3″ of rain we have received over the last 9 days has brought the lake level up over 23″ to -29″ below the top of the dam and it’s still raining. The lake has risen every day for the last 9 days and is now higher than it’s been since mid-June 2012. This makes for a runoff multiplier of 10x or 10″ of lake level rise for each inch of rain received. I attribute most of this to the time of year: with the ground frozen, less water soaks in and more runs off.

Lake levels normally fall during the winter due to a lack of precipitation but that’s not a problem this winter. I took the picture at left this morning when the surface of the lake was a little more than 30″ below the top of the dam, which is about 2″ above the water level at the dam. You can see water is now flowing out of the hole in the dam to the left of the outlet gate, indicating that the lake level has risen above the hole which is about -34″ below the top of the dam.

10 January 2014: User registration errors, site statistics, and privacy

It has come to my attention that a few people have been unable to register for this site because they are using one browser extension or another to block tracking code, cookies, malicious javascript, etc. One such extension which I myself use on some sites is Ghostery. What is happening is the code in the page that generates the “Captcha” is blocked so the graphic it isn’t visible. Consequently, the registration attempt fails with the error message: “ERROR: Invalid reCAPTCHA challenge parameter.” With all the attention the internet privacy meme is getting, I thought I’d address this problem head on and talk about site privacy.

First I should explain that the use of Captcha mechanism is intended to prevent automated registrations by robot crawlers intent on either hacking the site for their own nefarious purposes or spamming the site to no good end. They work by challenging people registering with human-readable-only information. This effectively thwarts the robots and is standard procedure on websites that want to restrict registrations to real people. I’m sure you’ve run across them before. A typical reCaptcha graphic from our site is shown at left. The solution is simple: disable your blocking systems temporarily, long enough to get registered; then you can turn it back on if you want and continue to browse in (relative) privacy.  I’ve updated the User Policy page with information about this. Hopefully anyone having problems registering will figure it out or contact me about it. Continue reading

10 January 2014: Lake water level rises 13.7″ from last rain storm

The rain storm back on the 5th and 6th of this month dropped 1.37″ of rain on us. That rain has brought the lake up a total of 13.7″  for a runoff multiplier of 10x meaning that 1″ of rain brought the lake up 10″. This is impressive; normally the runoff multiplier is around 4x meaning an inch of rain brings the lake up 4″ but there is more runoff this time of year because the ground is frozen and little if any runoff soaks into the ground. The shape of the lake has something to do with it too: sometimes runoff causes the lake to get deeper, sometimes it causes it to get bigger, and sometimes it results in both happening at the same time. We’ve been in the “get deeper” range. Next up is the “get bigger” range where an inch of rain might only bring the lake up 2 or 3 inches but the size of the lake will increase substantially.

The lake level is now -39.2″ below the top of the dam or only 5.2″ above the hole in the dam. The lake is set to rise again fro the 1″ to 2″ of rain forecast for this weekend though I don’t think we’ll see a runoff multiplier of 10x, more likely 5x. That will bring the lake up to and likely above the hole in the dam which at last check was around -34″ below the top of the dam.

The thumbnail at left is a bit of a misnomer since the water level is a long ways from being “high” in my opinion. However Paul Kelley might have a conniption fit next time he stops by to check the Water Level Charts. The higher the better I say.

 

10 January 2014 Lincoln County News: Dam Owner Cries Foul With Comment Process

I’ve been a little busy this week so I’m just now getting around to posting about the latest article in this week’s Lincoln County News. This one covers the recently submitted final comments on the Draft Clary Lake water level order and it is presumably by Dominik Lobkowicz though there is no byline on it. Like the KJ article earlier this week, the focus is primarily on Paul Kelley and his complaints about the draft order:

Dam Owner Cries Foul With Comment Process

Here’s a locally archived copy:

[ARCHIVED]: Dam Owner Cries Foul With Comment Process

 

08 January 2014: Additional Comments on the Draft water level order

At my request, Beth Callahan has forwarded me a compilation of all the comments received by the Department on the DRAFT Clary Lake water level order. These include 3 emailed comments sent directly to Beth Callahan that, through understandable oversight, never made it to the Service List.  These include emails from Senator Christopher Johnson, Steven Sheppard of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, and Jeff Murphy of NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service.

Upon review it is easy to see why these “comments” were not forwarded to the Service List. Steven Sheppard of the USF&W’s comment consisted of the single sentence “The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service supports the provisions of the Draft Order.” Likewise, Jeff Murphy of NOAA asked a simple question and got a simple answer. Senator Johnson’s comment consisted of pointing out a grammatical error.  Still, as trivial as these comments were, everyone is entitled to read them. Regarding Chris Johnson’s comment, I should point out that I was carbon-copied on Chris’s email to Beth Callahan and it never dawned on me that by all rights and purposes it should have been shared with the Service List.

I’ve separated out the extra comments into 2 files:

Comment by Senator Christopher Johnson on the Draft Clary Lake water level order

Agency Comments on the Draft Clary Lake water level order

Here’s the compilation of ALL the comments received by the Department

All Comments Received on the Draft Clary Lake water level  order

Here are links to the comments I’ve already posted:

Petitioner and Clary Lake Association comments

Pleasant Pond Mill LLC comments

Thomas Gillette comments

07 January 2014 Kennebec Journal: Whitefield dam owner criticizes water level plan

kelley_at_micPaul Koenig of the Kennebec Journal has written yet another article that has appeared online today and should be in the print edition tomorrow. According to the article, Senator Christopher Johnson, the US Fish & Wildlife Service, and the National Marine Fisheries Service also submitted comments. I was not aware of this. I’m looking into it. In the meantime, here’s the article:

Whitefield dam owner criticizes water level plan

I was interviewed earlier today and apparently, so was Paul Kelley.

Here’s an archived copy should the KJ link stop working.

[ARCHIVED]:  Whitefield dam owner criticizes water level plan

06 January 2014: Pleasant Pond Mill LLC files comments on the DAFT water level order

cliff-coyote_0Well Mr. Kelley did finally submit his written comments at 4:40 PM this afternoon, but only to a subset of the addresses on the Service List which incidentally didn’t include my address or the addresses of a number of other people. I’m sure this was a mistake and I would prefer to think that Mr. Kelley is just email-challenged rather than that he intentionally left a number of people off the distribution list.

Without further adieu:

REPLY OF PLEASANT POND MILL LLC TO THE MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROPOSED DAFT FINAL AGENCY ORDER

I have only scanned it, I will read it more carefully shortly. I did print off a copy and noticed the reference line… the question is, is Mr. Kelley’s characterization of the water level order as DAFT a typo or intentional?

06 January 2014: Petitioner’s comments and Clary Lake Association comments submitted to DEP

bugsI have submitted comments to the DEP On behalf of the Petitioners on the Draft Clary Lake water level order issued by the Department on December 19th. Originally due on 30 December, the deadline was extended one week to today. I’m still waiting to see what Mr. Kelley will submit. He has until 5 PM to get them in. Ellis Percy also prepared comments which were sent in this afternoon:

Petitioner’s comments on the Draft Clary Lake water level order

Clary Lake Association comments on the Draft Clary Lake water level order

Earlier today Mr. Kelley sent an email to most of the Service List (below). I say most of the Service List because my address was conspicuously absent. It was only because someone forwarded me a copy with comments that I got the message at all. I’m sure it was an oversight: Continue reading

06 January 2014 Kennebec Journal: Whitefield dam owner denied additional time to comment on lake plan

read_all_about_itThere is a  new article by Paul Koenig in yesterday’s Sunday January 5th Kennebec Journal about Pleasant Pond Mill LLC’s travails in obtaining more time to comment on the Draft water level order.  I was interviewed for the article by Mr. Koenig on Friday. I didn’t get a Sunday paper but a few people who did said they didn’t see it in the paper so it may only have appeared online. In any case, here it is:

Whitefield dam owner denied additional time to comment on lake plan

To refresh everyone’s memory, the Draft Clary Lake water level order was issued on 19 December and provided for an 11 day comment period ending on Monday, 30 December. They extended the comment period 1 week to the end of business today, January 6th. Continue reading

04 January 2014: Volume 1 Issue 7 of Whitefield Newsletter now available

whitefield_logoThe Town of Whitefield has been publishing a monthly newsletter since last July and they’re quite enjoyable. If you happen by the North Whitefield Superette you’ll find the latest issue on the counter, free of charge. Otherwise they’re available online on the Town of Whitefield website. You can also receive the newsletter by email by signing up at www.townofwhitefield.com/Newsletter.html.

This issue has an article by Tony Marple about the Central Maine Astronomical Society’s Brower Observatory located across the road from my house in my sister’s back yard, at 341 Jefferson Road. The observatory houses a 16″ Newtonian reflector as well as numerous other scopes of all sorts, and an extensive library of books, star charts, and atlases. The Central Maine Astronomical Society’s website is http://maineastro.com/

January 2014 Whitefield News

Incidentally, Whitefield’s tax maps and assessors land records are now online. This is huge. Get with it Jefferson! More about this in another post when I get a chance.

02 January 2013: DEP Responds to PPM motion to reconsider

bam-customThe DEP responded in record time to Pleasant Pond Mill LLC’s motion to withdraw, reconsider, or elucidate sent to the Service List earlier this morning. I expected a quick response, but I didn’t expect them to dismiss it so perfunctorily and with so little fanfare. They did not bother with a procedural order, they simply sent this short email:


Dear Mr. Kelley,

Thank you for your submittal, dated January 2, 2014 containing a Motion for Withdrawal/Reconsideration/Elucidation of the Department’s Procedural Order #9.  The Department has reviewed and considered your Motion and determined that Procedural Order #9 will not be withdrawn or reconsidered.  The ruling issued in Procedural Order #9 stands on its own merits.  The deadline to receive comments on the draft Water Level Order remains as Monday, January 6, 2014.

Sincerely,

Beth Callahan
Project Manager
Division of Land Resource Regulation
Maine Department of Environmental Protection


It is pretty clear to me that the Department of Environmental Protection is tired of Mr. Kelley’s quasi-legal maneuvering and have had enough. One has to wonder whether Mr. Kelley has gotten the message.

02 January 2014: Pleasant Pond Mill LLC submits Motion for Withdrawal/Reconsideration/Elucidation to DEP

kelley-headshotAt 9:33 AM this morning Paul Kelley of Pleasant Pond Mill LLC sent a message to the Service List in which he filed a 5 page Motion with the Department of Environmental Protection addressed to Hearing Officer Heather Parent and Project Manager Beth Callahan. If anyone had any questions as to whether Paul Kelley was going to quietly submit to the Department of Environmental Protection’s water level order, this should dispel them. I certainly didn’t have any. The Motion is as follows:

MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL/RECONSIDERATION/ELUCIDATION OF THE MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (“DEP”) PROCEDURAL ORDER #9, ISSUED DECEMBER 27, 2013; AND FURTHER INCORPORATING ADDITIONAL MOTION(S) FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO PROPOSED DRAFT WATER LEVEL ORDER AND OTHER PROCEDURAL MATTERS.

I haven’t read it yet.  I will shortly and will comment later. Here’s the 5 page Motion:

Here is the accompanying email:
Continue reading

01 January 2014: Happy New Year & Water Level Year End Summary

13 waterlevelchart_2013Happy New Year everyone! It is the beginning of another year and I’ve posted the 2013 water level chart (at left) to the Archived 2013 Water Level Charts page. For some reason I can’t fathom (pun intended) the water level charts are not the most popular items on the web site, in fact only 2 people check them out with any regularity, David Hodsdon and Paul Kelley. David’s interest stems from having a scientific bent to begin with coupled with having measured the water level of Clary Lake off and on for the better part 30 years, and he just likes to admire a pretty chart. I suppose Paul has his own reasons for paying such close attention to the lake level. Perhaps he too just enjoys a pretty chart.

Initially I started measuring the water level of the lake to document the water level fluctuation and assess it’s impact on the environs of Clary Lake, to be used as evidence in support of our petition initiative. As with David, I also happen to have a scientific inclination as well as the technical skills and professional experience required so it has also served as a form of entertainment.  Call me crazy. Since starting measuring the lake level however, it has become more of a ritual, something that I do with a measure of solemnity though it’s challenging to keep it up on a regular schedule during the winter due to the complications of snow and ice. It remains to be seen if I will continue with the practice once the Water Level Order goes into effect and water level measurements are being made at the dam; I expect I will at least initially because I want to investigate further the dynamics of runoff, water flow, and their effect on the elevation difference between the lake surface and the water level at the dam.

Some 2013 Statistics:
There are lots of ways to slice and dice the volume of data I’ve collected. Here are a few statistics for the past year. If anyone is interested in the raw data, just ask.

  • We started the year at -48.36″ below the top of the dam and ended slightly lower at -51.48″ below the top of the dam.
  • We received 40.23″ of precipitation in 2013 compared to 39.98″ for 2012, only 1/4″ difference.
  • The highest water level we saw in 2013 was -31″ on May 30th and the lowest was recorded on January 29th when it reached -61.68″ below the top of the dam. For comparison, in 2012 the highest was -19.08″ on June 7th and the lowest was -62.52″ on April 21th.
  • The average water level in 2013 was -48.9″ below the top of the dam compared to -45.7″ below the top of the dam in 2012.
  • In 2013, the dam’s gate was closed for only 10 days, from May 17th to May 26th during which time we received 4.33″ of rain which brought the lake up 25.56″ to -31″ below the top of the dam by May 30th, the highest the lake would get in 2013.
  • In 2013 the depth of water over the foot of the State boat launch was equal to or greater than the design value of 2.3′ for only 7 days during the last week of May.

Archived 2013 Water Level Charts