There is an article in today’s Central Maine Papers (Kennebec Journal, Morning Sentinel) by staff writer Paul Koenig about the letter written by Representative Sanderson and Senator Johnson last week (see: Representative Sanderson, Senator Johnson send letter to DEP). The article suggests the DEP has failed to protect Clary Lake by not taking enforcement action on the water level order issued by the Department over a year and a half ago, in late January 2014. The article acknowledges why DEP has not taken enforcement action, but that their failure to do anything nonetheless is “clearly in violation” of their legislative mandate to protect and prevent diminution of the state’s natural environment. Because the Water Level Order (WLO) is under appeal in Superior Court, if the DEP were to attempt traditional enforcement action, lawyers for the dam owner would likely request a stay of the Order from the court, and they would probably get one, because that’s how these things roll. However, the article points out that in light of the severe ongoing impact low water is having on Clary Lake shore owners and the sensitive lake environment, they are entitled to equitable relief in the form of a high water level while the court case plays out. Equitable relief as I understand it is a judgment that the Court would issue in lieu of the Department taking actual enforcement action. Actions by the DEP such as entering the property to physically implement the terms of the order are provided for in the statute.
The article quotes Paul Kelley, owner of the company that owns the Clary Lake dam as saying that one of the reasons why he can’t raise the water level of Clary Lake is because doing so “would expose Pleasant Pond Mill LLC to potential lawsuits from upstream and the owner of the mill property below the dam.” I’ve always dismissed Kelley’s concerns over being sued by Aquafortis Associates LLC because, really, who believe his partner, Richard Smith, is going to sue him for high water damage? Continue reading