Category Archives: Petition News

News about the Clary Lake water level petition

26 December 2013: Pleasant Pond Mill LLC files motion for extension to comment period

expect_delaysPleasant Pond Mill LLC has just submitted a request to Presiding Officer Parent for an extension to the comment period provided to review and comment on the Draft water level order:

MOTION REQUESTING ADDITIONAL TIME TO REVIEW AND COMMENT

The comment period deadline is currently 5 PM next Monday, 30 December.

Having now carefully read Mr. Kelley’s motion for extension for the second time, all I can say is that I am sorry that this DRAFT water level order didn’t come at a more convenient time for him, I’m sorry that he hasn’t been able to consult with his attorney, and I’m sorry that his travel plans will interfere with his attention to this matter. The fact of the matter is, Mr. Kelley should have seen this coming. He has had amply opportunity over the past 2 years to present his side of this matter but the time for talking is now over: the evidence has been heard, the decision made, and the sentence is about to be imposed.  Mr. Kelley better get busy. It’s time to get to work.

 

26 December 2013: Gillette comments on Draft Water Level Order sent to DEP

speakingThomas Gillette has submitted his prepared comments to the Department of Environmental Protection and the Service List  in regard the recently issued DRAFT Clary Lake water level order. They are short and to the point.

Thomas has been an intervener in these proceeding from the start and he testified at the public hearing back in August 2012. He is a long-time Clary Lake Association member and resident on Clary Lake though he is currently no longer a land owner himself. He has written these comments on behalf lake shore owners Kate Seba, Christopher Gillette, and Baxter Gillette as well as his next door neighbor lake shore owner Ken Rapp:

Gillette comments on Draft Water Level Order

Many thanks to Thomas for his continued support and assistance in this matter.

25 December 2013 Lincoln County News: DEP Seeks Comments on Draft Clary Lake Water Level Order

paperThere’s a comprehensive, fact-filled article in this weeks Lincoln County News about the Draft Clary Lake Water Level Order:

DEP Seeks Comments on Draft Clary Lake Water Level Order

We’re still out of power today, Christmas day. I’m still running on battery backup so I can only afford to stay online briefly. I have hopes they’ll get the ice storm damage repaired and the electricity flowing soon. If you’re in an area without power, remember to check on your neighbors.

DEP Seeks Comments on Draft Clary Lake Water Level Order [Archived Copy]

Cut wood, carry water. Merry Christmas Everyone 🙂

24 December 2013: Day before Christmas, Newspaper Articles, Ice storm Shenanigans, No power

runningWe’re without power here in Whitefield- I’m online now as long as I keep running on the treadmill… I wanted to let everyone know there’s an article in today’s KJ about the draft order:

DEP issues draft plan for Whitefield’s Clary Lake Dam

I was interviewed on the phone Monday for that, also for an article that will appear in the Lincoln County News tomorrow. I’ll post a link if and when I get back on line.  Stay warm everyone.

DEP issues draft plan for Whitefield’s Clary Lake Dam [Archived Copy]

21 December 2013: Thoughts on the DRAFT Clary Lake water level order

finish-line-aheadA number of people have asked me for to explain the DRAFT Clary Lake water level order that was issued the other day. It is a very detailed and complex document with many subtle (and some not-so-subtle) elements and there is certainly a lot to ponder. I have reviewed it at length and will state for the record that I think the water level order is FANTASTIC. It is essentially what we asked for, and it was worth waiting for.  I have begun preparing comments on behalf of the Petitioners to submit to the Department and which are due on or before December 30th, so I’m not going to go into a lot of detail now. I will however go over the highlights.  I encourage everyone to read the actual ORDER and if you have any questions or comments, please send them to me.

The first 11 pages of the draft order constitute a Findings of Fact and a review of the evidence that the Department considered in making their decision. It is totally worth reading, especially C. “TITLE, RIGHT, OR INTEREST” on page 6 of 16. The WATER LEVEL ORDER proper starts on page 11. The major elements of the order are as follows: Continue reading

19 December 2013: WE HAVE A WATER LEVEL ORDER

dep-logo-customLate this afternoon, the Department of Environmental Protection issued a draft water level order for Clary Lake.

According to the cover letter accompanying the order, interested parties have until the close of business Monday, December 30 to submit written comments.

[ORIGINAL] Draft Clary Lake Water Level Order  (2.0 megs)

A few people have had trouble sucking down the file due to the size.  By sacrificing some image quality I’ve managed to reduce the file size to a mere 832 K:

[COMPRESSED] Draft Clary Lake Water Level Order (832 K)

The draft Clary Lake Water Level Order can now be viewed on the Department’s website at http://www.maine.gov/dep/comment/index.html.  The specific URL is: http://www.maine.gov/dep/comment/comment.html?id=610700

I am still reading it. I’ll provide a summary shortly.

17 December 2013: The water level petition takes a big step forward

eyesI called and spoke with Assistant Attorney General Thomas Harnett this afternoon, he’s been handling the 2 Clary Lake petitions (the water level petition and Kelley’s petition for release from dam ownership or water level maintenance). It turns out that Mr. Harnett was in a car accident this past fall and he has been away from work for some time recovering. Apparently, the draft water level order has been sitting on his desk awaiting his return.

Mr. Harnett told me when we spoke today that he has recently returned to work and as of this morning had completed his review of the draft Clary Lake water level order and returned it to the Department. While Mr. Harnett didn’t know what the Department’s plans were, it is reasonable to assume now that AG review of the draft water level order is complete that there is little to stop the Department from issuing the water level order in short order. A number of sources have indicated the water level order could be issued any time including most recently Senator Christopher Johnson’s correspondence which cited the Senate Chair of the Natural Resources Committee, Senator Jim Boyle as saying that DEP Commissioner Aho had indicated the order would be released “in early December.” It would appear now that the hangup has been waiting for Mr. Harnett to return to work.

I did not ask Mr. Harnett for details of the water level order and he didn’t volunteer any. As I understand it, the Presiding Officer will issue the water level order as a Procedural Order and interested parties will be given an opportunity to review it and comment. From past experience I would expect the comment period to be at least 2 weeks and possibly as much as a month. That’s about as much speculation as I’m going to engage in just now.

10 December 2013: Clary Lake Water Level Petition Update

senator_johnson

Senator Chris Johnson

Looking back, I see I haven’t posted to this site since November 21st. There are several reasons for this, the primary one being I didn’t have any good news to report and for another I’ve been rather busy with work, which is a welcome change. Today I received an email from Aaron Miller, Whitefield Town Clerk with a couple of documents from Senator Chris Johnson. One is a letter dated 11 September 2013 to DEP Commissioner Patricia Aho and the other is a letter to the Whitefield Selectmen just last week dated 05 December 2013.  The letter to the DEP Commissioner was posted to the Town of Whitefield’s Facebook Page today. I thought I’d post them here.

I’ve been in close contact with Senator Johnson around this issue for the last year and a half and I’ve found him to be sympathetic, very responsive, and very helpful. He had sent a letter to Commissioner Aho back in late August of this year, asking for an update on the status of the water level petition. I corresponded with him on September 9th at which time he told me of a response he’d received from the Commissioner the previous week stating that it would likely be another 6 weeks before the order was issued (implying a date of somewhere around the end of October). He also told me he intended to respond to her and he did send the following letter, which I had not seen until today:

11 September 2013 Letter to Commissioner Aho

Here’s Senator Johnson’s response to a letter from the Whitefield Selectmen:

05 December 2013 Letter to Whitefield Selectmen

Continue reading

19 November 2013: Whitefield residents vote not to pursue dam ownership. Again.

img_4059-mediumAt a special Whitefield town meeting tonight, Whitefield residents voted not to pursue ownership of the Clary Lake dam just like they did at a similar meeting held last spring. I don’t know about anyone else, but I certainly didn’t expect a different outcome. At least the meeting was well attended! Jefferson held their own special meeting last night and only about 20 people showed up. They too voted (again) not to pursue ownership of the Clary Lake dam and the meeting was over in less than 5 minutes. It was over so quickly that Paul Kelley, who arrived a few minutes late, was walking into the  meeting while everyone else was walking out.

img_4069-smallPaul Kelley was at tonight’s meeting as was Richard Smith, Manager of Aquafortis Associates LLC. Ellis Percy, President of the Association stopped by long enough to present Kelley with a revised offer on the Clary Lake dam. So far, attempts to meet with Kelley to discuss the Association’s purchase of the dam have been unsuccessful but we remain optimistic that the Association will end up owning the dam sooner or later.

Tonight’s meeting pretty much wraps up Kelley’s obligations under the statute. Next step is his consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection.

27 September 2013: No new petition for release from dam ownership

forsalebyowner-customAs of 3:30 PM today, Friday the 27th of September, Mr. Kelley had not filed a new petition for release from dam ownership or water level maintenance with the DEP despite what his recent “notice of intent to file” stated. He has instead requested a 180 day extension to his current petition as provided for by the statute. I would have thought it made more sense for Mr. Kelley to withdraw his original petition and submit a new one so as to remove all question about the validity of his initial public notice. Now, while he has another 180 days to try and find a new owner for the dam, the uncertainty of whether his petition is valid or not still hangs over it like a cloud. I would have wanted to be rid of that uncertainty but apparently Mr. Kelley doesn’t mind it. Will DEP conclude in 6 months that he has failed to correct the deficiencies in his original filing? Who knows!

With his petition being continued for another 6 months, the dam remains for sale and Mr. Kelley must actively seek a new owner, and entertain offers on the property. After all, the purpose of the petition for release from dam ownership or water level maintenance is to facilitate the transfer of a dam from someone who doesn’t want it to someone who does. As is stated in the recent LCN article, the Clary Lake Association does want it, and intends to actively pursue ownership of the Clary Lake dam as soon as the Department places a water level order on it.

23 September 2013: Deja Vu all over again: Pleasant Pond Mill LLC files petition for release from dam ownership. Again.

dohI received a form letter from Paul Kelley today it being notice of his intent to file a petition for release from dam ownership or water level maintenance. Again. Those of you who have been paying attention will recall that back on May 17th of this year Kathy Howatt of the DEP sent Paul Kelley a letter notifying him that his petition was deficient because he failed to satisfy the statutory requirements for providing public notice of his intent to file. Ms. Howatt offered him the opportunity to withdraw the petition and refile it or alternatively, he could wait until the 180 day consultation period arrived and they would dismiss it at that time. Kelley opted to proceed as if the rules just didn’t apply to him. Continue reading

24 August 2013 Lincoln County News: Montsweag Dam inspection report is in

finger-in-dikeDavid Hodsdon sent me an article from last week’s Lincoln County News about a recent inspection of the Montsweag dam in Wiscasset. The inspection was conducted by Wright and Pierce Engineering Company. Of particular interest is the last paragraph which describes the permitting requirements for the making the repairs:

“The inspection report of the dam indicates the repairs discussed in the report would be exempt from DEP regulatory permitting under the Maine Natural Resources Protection Act providing the activities do not require dredging of sediments and all improvements will take place within the footprint of the dam. Should dredging activities or other improvements change the dimensions of the Dam below the high water mark it would require review and permitting with both the Maine DEP and the Corps of Engineers, according to the inspection report.”

Continue reading

20 August 2013 Kennebec Journal Article: DEP says no timetable on Clary Lake water level decision

newspaper_bw-customPaul Koenig has written an article that appears in today’s Kennebec Journal. I was interviewed for the article late last week.

DEP says no timetable on Clary Lake water level decision

The notion that a “historic” mill building located down stream from and designed to accommodate the outflows from Clary Lake and use them to generate power should after over 100 years suddenly be at risk from high water damage is bad enough. Concluding that the water level of Clary Lake should be drastically lowered so as to severely restrict outflows to protect this building is just wrong. To then impose these flow restrictions on the dam property via restrictive covenants is ludicrous.

The mill pond dam head wall leaks and the original outlet weir has been filled with concrete, severely limiting the amount of water that the mill pond can accommodate. These issues were pointed out in a 2003 engineering study conducted for Pleasant Pond Mill LLC, the original owner of the mill property. The study recommended reopening the original outlet weir. This step has not been taken.

The KJ provides opportunity for people to comment on articles. I recommend you do so.

15 August 2013: Observations on PPM and AQF Comments

thinkerI’ve had a chance to reread and ponder (like the chump at left) the comments posted by Tony Buxton today and I have a few observations to make before I move on. First, very little of the document has anything to do with the actual restrictive covenants themselves, which is what this exercise was all about I think. In fact, only one paragraph on the first page addresses them at all. I particularly like this part:

1. Declaration of Restrictive Covenants:

“As consideration for PPM agreeing to be bound by the Restrictive Covenants, AQF agreed to waive certain of the claims it may have had prior to adoption of the Restrictive Covenants against PPM for damage from flows of water in excess of 50 cubic feet per second.”

So we’re to believe that Richard Smith coerced Paul Kelley into agreeing to be bound by the covenants in exchange for waiving the right to press claims he “may have had” (or might not have had?) for high water damage to the mill building. Really?

Buxton offered no rebuttal of my assertion that Kelley’s Covenants are invalid and will have no effect on the ability of the Department to place and administer a water level order on the Clary Lake dam. The rest is of no consequence.

15 August 2013: [UPDATED] Response of PPM and AQF to Procedural Order 8

bamboozleThis just in to the Service List: Tony Buxton himself has responded to the request for comments in Procedural Order #8 and I’m posting it only having skimmed it. So far, I like mine better.

OK so I’ve had a chance read Mr. Buxton’s comments carefully, several times. I still like mine better. I can only imagine how Ms. Parent will enjoy reading this.

15 August 2013: Petitioner’s Comments on Kelley’s Restrictive Covenants

bugsMoments ago I posted the Petitioner’s Comments on the Restrictive Covenants that Paul Kelley recently placed on the Clary Lake dam to the Service List. I can’t wait to see what Kelley comes up with. I mean, I am holding my breath. I am on the edge of my seat. I am- Oh well, you get the idea. If Kelley follows his standard procedure and waits till the last minute, we can expect them sometime shortly before 5 PM. So hours to wait, ho-hum. No need to guess what I think of these covenants, here are my comments:

And no, there’s no particular significance of a Bugs Bunny thumbnail on this post. I just happen to like the little guy.

12 August 2013: DEP Procedural Order #8 Issued

dep-logo-customThe Department wasted no time in addressing my submission last Friday of Kelley’s Covenants, issuing this afternoon Department Procedural Order #8. The Order is short and sweet as is the time given for comments: 3 days. The Order included an updated Service List, a copy of my email, and  all 17 pages of the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants. The Order proper is short:


On August 9, 2013, GEORGE S. FERGUSSON, spokesperson for the petitioners, submitted to the Department correspondence stating that a flow restriction of no greater’ than 50 cubic feet per second had been placed upon the Clary Lake Dam. As support of this statement, Mr. Fergusson submitted a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants, which was stamped as recorded on August 5, 2013 at the Lincoln County Registry of Deeds in Book #4696 on Page #59.

Future Course 0f Proceeding:

Parties may submit written comments on this documentation to the Department no than August 15, 2013. Comments must be copied to all parties on the Service List.

DONE AND DATED IN AUGUSTA, MAINE, THIS 12th DAY OF August, 2013.

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTÍON

Heather L. Parent, Presiding Officer and Policy Director


Here’s a copy of the order:

L22585BN_Procedural Order_8.pdf

09 August 2013: Fergusson notifies Petition Service List of Kelley’s Covenants

time-running-out_0I just sent the following email to the Clary Lake water level petition Service List notifying everyone of what will inevitably turn out to be Kelley’s latest useless and futile move to hamstring the Department and usurp their authority. I also spoke this morning with Kathy Howatt, the DEP staff person handling Kelley’s petition for release from dam ownership. She was unaware that Kelley filed restrictive covenants on the dam property and she didn’t sound particularly happy to be finding out about it from me- grateful to be informed, but not happy. For Kelley, time is running out.

Hi Beth:

I want to bring everyone’s attention to a recent change in the legal status of the Clary Lake dam property representing Pleasant Pond Mill LLC’s latest attempt to usurp the authority of the Department of Environmental Protection. Last Monday afternoon, August 5th, Mr. Kelley recorded a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants at the Lincoln County Registry of Deeds in Book 4696, Page 59. In a nutshell: these covenants restrict the owner of the Clary Lake Dam (currently Pleasant Pond Mill LLC) and benefit the owner of the Clary Mill building (currently Aquafortis Associates LLC) such that if the dam owner allows more than 50 cubic feet of water per second to pass through and/or over Clary Lake dam they can be sued by the owner of the mill building for damages, legal fees, etc. These covenants run with the land. Continue reading

07 August 2013: Kelley imposes Restrictive Covenants on self. Really.

From the “You can’t make this stuff up” department: In a blatant attempt to usurp the authority of the Department of Environmental Protection, Kelley has taken his efforts to confuse, complicate, and obfuscate matters to new, stunningly bizarre heights: he’s gone and imposed Restrictive Covenants on himself (and any future owner of the dam) benefiting Aquafortis Associates LLC (or any future owner of their property) such that no more than 50 cubic feet per second of water may be discharged through or over the Clary Lake dam. Ever. These covenants shall run with the land in perpetuity (that’s forever folks). Failure to comply with the terms of this declaration shall be grounds for an action against the dam owner by Aquafortis Associates LLC or their  successor in interest. In other words, the owner of the Clary Mill building can now sue the owner of the Clary Lake dam if they let more than 50 cubic feet of water per second flow out of the lake. Words escape me. Continue reading

25 July 2013: Thoughts on where we are and how this will all play out

rock_and_hard_place2Paul Kelley has fought this water level petition tooth and nail ever since it was filed over a year and a half ago. All his efforts have been futile while costing him a lot of money. Stalling is a fine tactic I guess when it leads to a tactical advantage; when it simply delays the inevitable, then it is just a waste of one’s time and money. He has lost the battle and he knows it. He is now on record saying that he just “wants out” and he’s looking for an exit strategy. What he’s come up with defies understanding: he sees his petition for release from dam ownership or water level maintenance resulting in a breach order from the Department. Once he has that in hand, he hires a backhoe to come in and dismantle the Clary Lake dam and then he just disappears. His development plans thwarted through his own incompetent efforts to ram them through the town planning process, he lashes out leaving destruction and devastation behind him as he departs for greener pastures. What a guy. Well, that scenario will only happen in his dreams. Reality I’m certain has a less pleasant outcome in store for him. Continue reading