Pleasant Pond Mill LLC has just submitted a request to Presiding Officer Parent for an extension to the comment period provided to review and comment on the Draft water level order:
MOTION REQUESTING ADDITIONAL TIME TO REVIEW AND COMMENT
The comment period deadline is currently 5 PM next Monday, 30 December.
Having now carefully read Mr. Kelley’s motion for extension for the second time, all I can say is that I am sorry that this DRAFT water level order didn’t come at a more convenient time for him, I’m sorry that he hasn’t been able to consult with his attorney, and I’m sorry that his travel plans will interfere with his attention to this matter. The fact of the matter is, Mr. Kelley should have seen this coming. He has had amply opportunity over the past 2 years to present his side of this matter but the time for talking is now over: the evidence has been heard, the decision made, and the sentence is about to be imposed. Mr. Kelley better get busy. It’s time to get to work.

Thomas Gillette has submitted his prepared comments to the Department of Environmental Protection and the Service List in regard the recently issued
There’s a comprehensive, fact-filled article in this weeks Lincoln County News about the Draft Clary Lake Water Level Order:
We’re without power here in Whitefield- I’m online now as long as I keep running on the treadmill… I wanted to let everyone know there’s an article in today’s KJ about the draft order:
A number of people have asked me for to explain the DRAFT Clary Lake water level order that was issued the other day. It is a very detailed and complex document with many subtle (and some not-so-subtle) elements and there is certainly a lot to ponder. I have reviewed it at length and will state for the record that I think the water level order is FANTASTIC. It is essentially what we asked for, and it was worth waiting for. I have begun preparing comments on behalf of the Petitioners to submit to the Department and which are due on or before December 30th, so I’m not going to go into a lot of detail now. I will however go over the highlights. I encourage everyone to read the actual
Late this afternoon, the Department of Environmental Protection issued a draft water level order for Clary Lake.
I called and spoke with Assistant Attorney General Thomas Harnett this afternoon, he’s been handling the 2 Clary Lake petitions (the water level petition and Kelley’s petition for release from dam ownership or water level maintenance). It turns out that Mr. Harnett was in a car accident this past fall and he has been away from work for some time recovering. Apparently, the draft water level order has been sitting on his desk awaiting his return.
As of 3:30 PM today, Friday the 27th of September, Mr. Kelley had not filed a new petition for release from dam ownership or water level maintenance with the DEP despite what his recent “
I received a form letter from Paul Kelley today it being notice of his intent to file a petition for release from dam ownership or water level maintenance. Again. Those of you who have been paying attention will recall that back on May 17th of this year Kathy Howatt of the DEP sent Paul Kelley
David Hodsdon sent me an article from last week’s Lincoln County News about a recent inspection of the Montsweag dam in Wiscasset. The inspection was conducted by Wright and Pierce Engineering Company. Of particular interest is the last paragraph which describes the permitting requirements for the making the repairs:
Paul Koenig has written an article that appears in today’s Kennebec Journal. I was interviewed for the article late last week.
I’ve had a chance to reread and ponder (like the chump at left) the comments posted by Tony Buxton today and I have a few observations to make before I move on. First, very little of the document has anything to do with the actual restrictive covenants themselves, which is what this exercise was all about I think. In fact, only one paragraph on the first page addresses them at all. I particularly like this part:
This just in to the Service List: Tony Buxton himself has responded to the request for comments in Procedural Order #8 and I’m posting it only having skimmed it. So far, I like mine better.
Moments ago I posted the Petitioner’s Comments on the Restrictive Covenants that Paul Kelley recently placed on the Clary Lake dam to the
I just sent the following email to the Clary Lake water level petition
Paul Kelley has fought this water level petition tooth and nail ever since it was filed over a year and a half ago. All his efforts have been futile while costing him a lot of money. Stalling is a fine tactic I guess when it leads to a tactical advantage; when it simply delays the inevitable, then it is just a waste of one’s time and money. He has lost the battle and he knows it. He is now on record saying that he just “wants out” and he’s looking for an exit strategy. What he’s come up with defies understanding: he sees his petition for release from dam ownership or water level maintenance resulting in a breach order from the Department. Once he has that in hand, he hires a backhoe to come in and dismantle the Clary Lake dam and then he just disappears. His development plans thwarted through his own incompetent efforts to ram them through the town planning process, he lashes out leaving destruction and devastation behind him as he departs for greener pastures. What a guy. Well, that scenario will only happen in his dreams. Reality I’m certain has a less pleasant outcome in store for him.